The constraints are different in every sector
The agent architecture barely changes between industries. What changes is which actions are irreversible, who is allowed to approve them, and what has to be reconstructable afterwards. These pages describe the constraints we design around in each sector.
All sectors
- Financial servicesFinance teams do not need an agent that moves faster than they can check. They need one that does the reading, the matching and the investigating, then presents a decision to a named person and records that it did. That is the shape of every system we build in this sector.Read about agents in financial services
- HealthcareThere is a great deal of administrative work in healthcare that is repetitive, well defined and does not involve a clinical judgement. That is where an agent belongs. Everything on the other side of that line stays with the people qualified to make it, by design rather than by policy.Read about agents in healthcare
- EcommerceEcommerce operations is a high volume exception business. Most orders are fine. The work is entirely in the ones that are not, and that work is repetitive enough to automate and consequential enough that a person should still approve the money.Read about agents in ecommerce
- Professional servicesIn a firm that sells time, every hour spent assembling a document or checking a source is an hour that cannot be billed. Agents are unusually well suited to that work, and unusually badly suited to the judgement your clients are actually paying for. We build for the first and stay out of the second.Read about agents in professional services
Work in a sector that is not listed?
The pattern usually transfers. Tell us what the regulated actions are and we will tell you how the gates would be shaped.